USPTO serial 73076712
CLICKFAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLICKFAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
STRATCO METAL PROPRIETARY LIMITED
RICHMOND, SOUTH AUSTRALIA, AU
STRATCO METAL PROPRIETARY LIMITED
RICHMOND, SOUTH AUSTRALIA, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HENRY STERNBERG, ESQ.
HENRY STERNBERG ESQ WOFSEY, CERTILMAN, HAFT, LEBOW & BALIN805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10020-7505UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | GUTTERS, GUTTER DOWN SPOUTS, FASCIAS AND GUTTER SUSPENSION CLIPS, ALL MADE OF METAL | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 1986 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 11, 1986 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 1986 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 1986 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1976 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 1976 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 1976 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |