USPTO serial 73198065
WHY PAY MORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WHY PAY MORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Grand Rapids, MI
Grand Rapids, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Price, Heneveld, Huizenga & Cooper
P O BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 1986 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 1986 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 18, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 1981 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 1980 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 1980 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 1980 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 2, 1980 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 1979 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1979 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |