Drawing for EXPRESS BANKING

USPTO serial 73240243

EXPRESS BANKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXPRESS BANKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

No owner is listed on this record.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD E. BACKUS

FLEHR, HOHBACH, TEST, ALBRITON & HERBERTSTE 3400 FOUR EMBARCADO CTRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
No goods and services are listed.

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 1986EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 15, 1986ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 14, 1986EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Nov 19, 1985CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Feb 22, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 14, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 1984JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 30, 1983CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Sep 23, 1983EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 23, 1983JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Sep 6, 1983EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 16, 1982PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Dec 1, 1982PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Sep 30, 1982ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Nov 12, 1980CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 1980DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance