USPTO serial 73259476
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
No owner is listed on this record.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| No goods and services are listed. | |||
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 1984 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 1984 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 1984 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 1984 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 3, 1984 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 1983 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 3, 1983 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |