USPTO serial 73296199
FOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT V. VICKERS
ROBERT V VICKERS CLEVELAND200 TERMINAL TWR, OH 44113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | INDUSTRIAL CLEANER FOR CARPETS, RUGS ANDUPHOLSTERY | ABANDONED | Sep 30, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 1985 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 12, 1985 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 21, 1985 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 24, 1984 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1984 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 13, 1984 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 1981 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |