USPTO serial 73298610
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ, TN
DEALER ADVERTISING DEVELOPMENT, INC.
NASHVILLE, TN
Other trademarks owned by DEALER ADVERTISING DEVELOPMENT, INC.
ADVERTISING AND MARKETING DEVELOPMENT, INC.
NASHVILLE, TN
Other trademarks owned by ADVERTISING AND MARKETING DEVELOPMENT, INC.
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ, TN
ADVERTISING AND MARKETING DEVELOPMENT, INC.
NASHVILLE, TN
Other trademarks owned by ADVERTISING AND MARKETING DEVELOPMENT, INC.
ADVERTISING AND MARKETING DEVELOPMENT, INC.
NASHVILLE, TN
Other trademarks owned by ADVERTISING AND MARKETING DEVELOPMENT, INC.
ADVERTISING AND MARKETING DEVELOPMENT, INC.
NASHVILLE, TN
Other trademarks owned by ADVERTISING AND MARKETING DEVELOPMENT, INC.
ADVERTISING AND MARKETING DEVELOPMENT, INC.
NASHVILLE, TN
Other trademarks owned by ADVERTISING AND MARKETING DEVELOPMENT, INC.
DEALER ADVERTISING DEVELOPMENT, INC.
NASHVILLE, TN
Other trademarks owned by DEALER ADVERTISING DEVELOPMENT, INC.
ADVERTISING AND MARKETING DEVELOPMENT, INC.
NASHVILLE, TN
Other trademarks owned by ADVERTISING AND MARKETING DEVELOPMENT, INC.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROMOTING THE USE AND SALE OF THE SERVICES OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS THROUGH DISTRIBUTION OF PRINTED PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS AND BY RENDERING MERCHANDISING AND SALES PROMOTION ADVICE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 2, 1980 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 31, 1994 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 24, 1993 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 12, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 1987 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 7, 1984 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 1983 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 1983 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 1983 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 1981 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |