USPTO serial 73301046
NICALON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NICALON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger W. Parkhurst
PARKHURST & OLIFFP O BOX 19928ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | Raw Silicon Carbide Fibers and String, Rope, and Nets Made of Silicon Carbide Fibers, Used for Fiber Reinforced Plastic Material Having High Strength and High Modulus, Fiber Reinforced Metal, or Fiber Reinforced Ceramic | ACTIVE | May 1, 1980 |
| 023 | Yarns and Threads Made of Silicon Carbide Fibers, Mixed Silicon Carbide Fiber Yarns, Mixed Chemical Fiber Yarns with Silicon Carbide Fiber Yarns, Special Threads Made from Mixtures of Silicon Carbide Fiber Yarn with Metallic Fiber and Synthetic Resin Fiber Yarn, Used for Fiber Reinforced Plastic Material Having High Strength and High Modulus, Fiber Reinforced Metal, or Fiber Reinforced Ceramic | ACTIVE | May 1, 1980 |
| 024 | Woven Fabrics, Knittings, Felt and Other Cloths Made of Silicon Carbide Fibers and Yarns, Used for Fiber Reinforced Plastic Material Having High Strength and High Modulus, Fiber Reinforced Metal, or Fiber Reinforced Ceramic | ACTIVE | May 1, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nippon Carbon Company Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Nippon Carbon Company Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 023
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named NICALON
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 1990 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 1990 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 4, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 9, 1984 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 1984 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 1984 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1981 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1981 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |