Drawing for SPEEDEL

USPTO serial 73302879

SPEEDEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SPEEDEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Seedbed and Potting MixABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 1989ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Feb 22, 1989OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jan 26, 1989OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Jan 9, 1984OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Aug 30, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 1983PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 10, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 9, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 8, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 5, 1983NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 30, 1983CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 4, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 15, 1982CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 1982DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 12, 1982DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance