USPTO serial 73315493
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ezra Sutton
PLZ 9 900 RT 9WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Photographic Cameras and Parts Therefor | ABANDONED | Jun 5, 1981 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 1987 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 5, 1987 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 1986 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 1984 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 1984 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 1984 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1984 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1983 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1981 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1981 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |