USPTO serial 73339598
FIORAVANTI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHN, DEBBIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIORAVANTI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael I. Davis
JAMES D WEINBERGER FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Flour, and Preparations Made from Cereals; Bread, Biscuits, Cakes, Pastry and Bakery Goods; Baking Powder | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 1, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 1984 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 1984 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1984 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |