USPTO serial 73351446
DIOGENES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 1984
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE DESTROYED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIOGENES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Horn
MARTIN R HORN SPENSLEY HORN JUBAS & LUBITZ1880 CENTURY PARK E STE 500LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Testing of Employees and Prospective Employees by Use of Polygraph Equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 27, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 1990 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 10, 1984 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 18, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 1983 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 1983 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1983 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 17, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 1983 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |