USPTO serial 73354664
DATA SWITCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1472697Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 12, 1988
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DATA SWITCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LOUIS H. REENS
LOUIS H REENSST ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON & REENS986 BEDFORD STSTAMFORD, CT 06905Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC CONTROLS FOR SWITCHING BETWEEN COMPUTERS AND THEIR PERIPHERALS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 29, 1994 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 3, 1994 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1994 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Jan 12, 1988 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 18, 1987 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1987 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 5, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1987 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 24, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1987 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 22, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 1984 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1984 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1982 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1982 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |