USPTO serial 73356405
SHEEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHEEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD H. ZAITLEN
RICHARD H ZAITLEN1880 CENTURY PARK ESTE 500LOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | CONDITIONER FOR THE HAIR | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1988 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 1988 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 8, 1988 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 1987 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 1987 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |