USPTO serial 73365214
MICROMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1415716Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 4, 1986
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MICROMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lauri S. Thompson and others of 502466
Lauri S. Thompson and others of 502466 Greenberg Traurig, LLP3773 Howard Hughes Pkwy.Suite 400 N.Las Vegas, NV 89169Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | KITCHEN RANGE HOODS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 3, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BROAN MFG. CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BROAN MFG. CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BROAN MFG. CO., INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named MICROMATE
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 11, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 1992 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 19, 1992 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1986 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 12, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 3, 1985 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Sep 26, 1984 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 17, 1984 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 1984 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 14, 1984 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1984 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1984 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 12, 1984 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 5, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1983 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |