USPTO serial 73379532
STYLE CREST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHALLANT, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STYLE CREST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD O. BARTZ
RICHARD O BARTZ MINNEAPOLISBURD,BARTZ & GUTENKAUF1300 FOSHAY TWR, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HAIR AND SCALP PREPARATIONS FOR BLACK PERSONS, NAMELY, HAIR RELAXERS, HAIR SHAMPOO, HAIR CONDITIONERS, SCALP CONDITIONERS, HAIR COLD WAVE PRODUCTS, HAIR STYLING GELS, AND HAIR SETTING LOTIONS. | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1976 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 1987 | MSNI | MISPLACED SN INQUIRY | — |
| Jun 30, 1987 | MSNI | MISPLACED SN INQUIRY | — |
| Jun 18, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1984 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |