USPTO serial 73386195
IRON MAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACK, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IRON MAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ALLIANCE, NE
VENICE, CA
VENICE, CA
VENICE, CA
VENICE, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CARTER H. KOKJER
CARTER H KOKJER KOKJER KIRCHER BRADLEY WHARTON, ET AL2414 COMMERCE TWR911 MAIN STKANSAS CITY, MO 64105-2074Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | BODY BUILDER MAGAZINE CONTAINING NEWS AND INFORMATIONAL ARTICLES RELATING TO BODY BUILDING AND WEIGHT LIFTING COMPETITIONS AND EVENTS, TECHNIQUES AND NUTRITION | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RADER, PEARY
- Other trademarks owned by BALIK, JOHN
- Other trademarks owned by BIER, STEPHANIE
- Other trademarks owned by BIER, STEPHANIE
- Other trademarks owned by BALIK, JOHN
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named IRON MAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 2, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 7, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |