USPTO serial 73401486
COPPER GRIP +
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1386545Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 18, 1986
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COPPER GRIP +?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DISTRICT OF MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
QUEBEC, CA
QUEBEC, CA
QUEBEC, CA
LaSalle, QC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE N. LEWIS
WILLIAM H BREWSTER KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP1100 PEACHTREE ST STE 2800ATLANTA, GA 30309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | COPPER ALLOY COATING SOLD AS A COMPONENT PART OF METAL WALL CHANNELS AND JOINER PLATES FOR SWIMMING POOLS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 2679965 CANADA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VOGUE INDUSTRIES LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by VOGUE INDUSTRIES LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by VOGUE INDUSTRIES LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by VOGUE POOL PRODUCTS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named COPPER GRIP +
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2006 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 23, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 1994 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 22, 1993 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| May 20, 1993 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jan 4, 1993 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Jul 1, 1992 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 18, 1992 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1986 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 24, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |