USPTO serial 73402427
ENVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 20, 1987
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ENVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TAIPEI HSEIH, TW
SAN JOSE, CA
TAIPEI HSEIH, TW
TAIPEI HSEIH, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT D.HOVEY
ROBERT D HOVEY HOVEY, WILLIAMS, TIMMONS & COLLINS1400 MERCANTILE BANK TWR1101 WALNUT STKANSAS CITY, MO 64106Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY COLOR VIDEO DISPLAY STATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 3, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AOC INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ENVISION
- Other trademarks owned by AOC INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AOC INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ENVISION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 17, 1992 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 29, 1992 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 28, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 13, 1985 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Feb 21, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 6, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 8, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |