USPTO serial 73402950
MAID BRIGADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAID BRIGADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MAID BRIGADE SYSTEMS, INC., THE
SCARBOROUGH ONT. M1S3S7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES N. VIDEBECK
JAMES N VIDEBECK PATNAUDE, BATZ & VIDEBECKTER EXECUTIVE CTR COURT C1 S 376 SUMMIT AVEOAK BROOK TERRACE, IL 60181Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | CLEANING SERVICES FOR HOUSES, APARTMENTSAND OFFICES | ABANDONED | Nov 30, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 1985 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 3, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |