USPTO serial 73403902
PIZZA!PIZZA!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 1, 1986
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PIZZA!PIZZA!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, INC.
FARMINGTON, MI, US
LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, INC.
FARMINGTON, MI, US
DETRIOT, MI, US
LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, INC.
FARMINGTON, MI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joy J. Wildes
Joy J. Wildes Davis+Gilbert LLP1675 Broadway, 31st FloorNew York, NY 10019United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | PIZZA FOR CONSUMPTION ON OR OFF THE PREMISES | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LC TRADEMARKS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named PIZZA!PIZZA!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 8, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 8, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 26, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 1997 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 1996 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 1996 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Apr 17, 1996 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Mar 27, 1996 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1993 | CCON | COUNTERCLAIM OPP. NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 22, 1991 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 9, 1991 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1991 | CCON | COUNTERCLAIM OPP. NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 1991 | CCON | COUNTERCLAIM OPP. NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 1986 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 8, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 18, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |