USPTO serial 73403903
PIZZA!PIZZA!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 12, 1987
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PIZZA!PIZZA!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, INC.
FARMINGTON HILLS, MI, US
LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, INC.
FARMINGTON HILLS, MI, US
LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, INC.
FARMINGTON HILLS, MI, US
DETROIT, MI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joy J. Wildes
Joy J. Wildes Davis+Gilbert LLP1675 Broadway, 31st FloorNew York, NY 10019United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESTAURANT SERVICES | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LC TRADEMARKS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PIZZA!PIZZA!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | RNL3 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 28, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 27, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 27, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 20, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2017 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 20, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 6, 2016 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 16, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 1997 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Jun 19, 1997 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Apr 7, 1997 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1993 | CCON | COUNTERCLAIM OPP. NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 17, 1992 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 18, 1992 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1991 | CCON | COUNTERCLAIM OPP. NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 17, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 18, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 1986 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 1986 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1984 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |