USPTO serial 73412232
PURITEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PURITEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK I. PEROFF
MARK I PEROFF BIERMAN, BIERMAN AND PEROFF437 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | GLOVES FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, VETERINARY OR SURGICAL USE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 1987 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 1, 1987 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 1, 1987 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 27, 1986 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |