USPTO serial 73415124
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
00810 HELSINKI 81, FI
00810 HELSINKI 81, FI
00810 HELSINKI 81, FI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NEAL N. BEATON
NEAL N BEATON GILBERT, SEGALL & YOUNG430 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2006 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 12, 1991 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 3, 1991 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1985 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 23, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 1985 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1984 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 1984 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 1984 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |