USPTO serial 73416683
SLIDEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHALLANT, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SLIDEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
69260 CHARBONNIERES-LES-BAINS, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARRY E. BRETSCHNEIDER
BARRY E BRETSCHNEIDER WEGNER & BRETSCHNEIDERP O BOX 18218,WASHINGTON, DC 20036-8218UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DIAGNOSTIC AND LABORATORY REAGENTS | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | KITS FOR CARRYING OUT BACTERIOLOGICAL, IMMUNOLOGICAL, VIROLOGICAL, HEMATOLOGICALAND COAGULATION DETERMINATIONS FOR IN VITRO USE, COMPRISED OF CONTROL AND REFERENCE SERA, SENSITIZED LATEX PARTICLE REAGENTS AND TREATED SLIDES AND WELL PLATES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 17, 1987 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 6, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 21, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 28, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1987 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 13, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |