Drawing for THE PARTSFINDER

USPTO serial 73417327

THE PARTSFINDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1304461Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 6, 1984
Examiner
SKORO, LINDA
Law office
FILE DESTROYED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE PARTSFINDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. Gray

JOHN L GRAY EMENS, HURD, KEGLER & RITTER250 E BROAD STCOLUMBUS, OH 43215UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Leasing Access Time to a Computer Data Base in the Field of Automotive Parts for Cooperating Automotive DealersSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDDec 10, 1982

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 1988CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Oct 2, 1987C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL
May 21, 1987CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999
Aug 19, 1985PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Nov 6, 1984R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jul 24, 1984CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER
Jul 2, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 12, 1984CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 1, 1984CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Apr 2, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 30, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance