USPTO serial 73417490
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN F. A. EARLEY
JOHN F A EARLEY HARDING, EARLEY, FOLLMER & FRAILEY1910 TWO GIRARD PLZPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | TRANSLUCENT GLASS PANELS FOR DOORS, SHOWER DOORS, SIDE LIGHTS FOR ENTRANCE DOORS, OFFICE PARTITIONS, GLASS PANELS FOR JALOUSIE DOORS, WINDOWS, AND FURNITURE, REFRIGERATOR SHELVES, TUB ENCLOSURES, ENTRANCE DOORS, LAMPSHADES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, BUILDING CLADDING PANELS (SPANDREL) AND REQUESTS | ABANDONED | Jun 15, 1982 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 1984 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |