USPTO serial 73418302
SAN MARCOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALCAGNO, CARLA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAN MARCOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GARJALES, PUEBLA, MX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | CANNED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES | ABANDONED | Feb 4, 1971 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 1987 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 31, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 31, 1986 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 7, 1986 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 5, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |