USPTO serial 73420940
MELINDA -DRESSING FOR TWO-
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MELINDA -DRESSING FOR TWO-?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | MATERNITY AND NURSING LINGERIE AND CLOTHING, NAMELY, BLOUSES, DRESSES AND NIGHT GOWNS | ABANDONED | Jan 7, 1971 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 28, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 9, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |