USPTO serial 73424341
PT COMPONENTS, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUDGE, CONNIE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PT COMPONENTS, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
INDIANAPOLIS, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT A. BROWN
ROBERT A BROWNP O BOX 2127NORTHBROOK, IL 60062UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | POWER TRANSMISSION MACHINERY AND PARTS THEREOF NAMELY, SHAFTING, BEARINGS, BEARING BLOCKS, SEALS, RACES, ROLLERS, RETAINERS; DRIVE CHAINS, CONVEYING AND ELEVATING CHAINS, SPROCKETS, BELTS, SHEAVES, GEARS, GEAR DRIVES, SPEED REDUCERS, VARIABLE SPEED DRIVES; FLUID DRIVES, ECCENTRIC DRIVES; CLUTCHES, SHAFT COUPLINGS | ABANDONED | Oct 19, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 1986 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 4, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1985 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |