Drawing for LICKETY SPLIT

USPTO serial 73425945

LICKETY SPLIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LICKETY SPLIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN E. REILLY

JOHN E REILLY1554 EMERSON STDENVER, CO 80218UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030ICE CREAMABANDONEDJun 30, 1982
042ICE CREAM STORE SERVICESABANDONEDAug 10, 1981

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 1986EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 22, 1986ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 22, 1986EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 22, 1986CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 13, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 1985JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 13, 1985EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 3, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 17, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance