Drawing for COMMERZBANK

USPTO serial 73432264

COMMERZBANK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TAYLOR, CRAIG
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with COMMERZBANK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN B. PEGRAM

JOHN B PEGRAM DAVIS HOXIE FAITHFULL & HAPGOOD45 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036BANKING SERVICESABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 1991OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Dec 20, 1990ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jan 25, 1988OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jun 23, 1987PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 23, 1987PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 22, 1987NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 25, 1986CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 7, 1986CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Nov 5, 1986ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 17, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 3, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 1986ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN
Mar 17, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 16, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 31, 1985CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 25, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 13, 1985CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 23, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 27, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 1, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance