USPTO serial 73437531
FIORAVANTI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 5, 2003
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FIORAVANTI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
20125 MILANO, IT
20125 MILANO, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL F. KILMER, ESQ.
PAUL F KILMER HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLPSTE 1002099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | FRESH DRIED, PRESERVED, DEEP-FROZEN, READY -TO-USE ALIMENTARY PASTAS, BREAD, ITALIAN BREAD STICKS, CRACKERS, COOKIES, CAKES, BISCUITS, PASTRIES, TARTS, PIES, CANDY, CHOCOLATES, TOFFEES, CREAM PUFFS, ICE CREAMS, AND SEMIFREDDOS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 25, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 30, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1985 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |