Drawing for MICROBIOLOGY REFERENCE LABORATORY

USPTO serial 73452530

MICROBIOLOGY REFERENCE LABORATORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICROBIOLOGY REFERENCE LABORATORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES H. THOMAS

CHARLES H THOMAS CISLO, O'REILLY & THOMAS4401 ATLANTIC AVELONG BEACH, CA 90807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042CLINICAL LABORATORY TESTING OF SPECIMENS OF BLOOD, URINE, SPUTUM, AND TISSUEABANDONEDSep 1, 1976

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 1987EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 5, 1987ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 5, 1986EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Aug 5, 1986CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Apr 22, 1986EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Dec 12, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 1985JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 3, 1985EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 5, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 23, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 16, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance