Drawing for WIN A WEDDING

USPTO serial 73463798

WIN A WEDDING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
OMELKO, NANCY LOU
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WIN A WEDDING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID L. DICK

VIRGINIA E HOPKINS ESQ TAFT, STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER1620 EYE ST N WSTE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH THE CONDUCT OF A CONTESTABANDONEDJan 1, 1976

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 1986EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 28, 1986ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 27, 1986EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jan 6, 1986CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Nov 20, 1985EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 30, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 21, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 8, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 8, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 14, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 19, 1984AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance