USPTO serial 73468749
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRANK S. VADEN III
VADEN, EICKENROHT, THOMPSON BEDNAR & JAMISONONE RIVERWAYSTE 2420HOUSTON, TX 77056| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS RECORDED ON TAPES AND DISKS. | ABANDONED | Jun 15, 1983 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 1986 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 9, 1986 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 11, 1985 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 1985 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 28, 1985 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |