USPTO serial 73479782
AUTOCUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUTOCUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALBERT F. KRONMAN
ALBERT F KRONMAN20 VESEY STNEW YORK, NY 10007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VIDEO PROMPTING DISPLAY UNITS FOR USE IN DISPLAYING ALPHA-NUMERIC AND PICTORIAL INFORMATION; CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION DISPLAY EQUIPMENT--NAMELY, CAMERAS, MONITORS AND VIDEO TAPE PROJECTORS FOR USE BY PUBLIC SPEAKERS AND TELEVISION STATIONS | ABANDONED | Apr 5, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1987 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 2, 1986 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 16, 1986 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 8, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 27, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 27, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 1, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |