USPTO serial 73481889
HAROLOGI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 8, 1987
- Examiner
- WENDEL, HELEN R.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HAROLOGI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN
ABELMAN FRAYNE & REZAC708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PREPARATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT AND BEAUTIFICTION OF THE HAIR AND SKIN, NAMELY SHAMPOO, HAIR SETTING JELLY, HAIR CONDITIONER, SKIN MOISTURIZING PACKS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 1994 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 8, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 16, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1987 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 1987 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 1986 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 7, 1986 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1985 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 14, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |