USPTO serial 73482557
PRO-CUTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 17, 1996
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PRO-CUTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PRO-CUTS FRANCHISE CORPORATION
HURST, TX, US
MINNEAPOLIS, MN, US
FORT WORTH, TX, US
SCHILZ-PRICE ENTERPRISES, INC.
LAFAYETTE, CA, US
ANAHEIM, CA, US
ANAHEIM, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Samantha M. Quimby
Samantha M. Quimby FBT Gibbons LLP301 East Fourth Street3300 Great American TowerCincinnati, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | HAIRDRESSING SALON SERVICES FOR MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN | ACTIVE | May 4, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PRO-CUTS FRANCHISE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by RPC ACQUISITION CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by HAWKINS PRO-CUTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SCHILZ-PRICE ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DUKE SPECIALTY VENTURES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DUKE SPECIALTY VENTURES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PRO-CUTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Aug 18, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 7, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 1, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2002 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 25, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |