USPTO serial 73484549
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
DALLAS, TX
DALLAS, TX
DALLAS, TX
DALLAS, TX
DALLAS, TX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY W. CARR
GREGORY W CARR GARDERE & WYNNE, LLP3000 THANKSGIVING TWR1601 ELM STDALLAS, TX 75201-4761| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROMOTING AND ADVERTISING OF A PROFESSIONAL INDOOR SOCCER TEAM | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 12, 1984 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 1995 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 21, 1995 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 29, 1994 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1994 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 30, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 20, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 31, 1987 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Mar 17, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 15, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 13, 1986 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 31, 1985 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |