Drawing for RUST BUSTER

USPTO serial 73492987

RUST BUSTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WENDEL, HELEN R.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUST BUSTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NELSON E. KIMMELMAN

WEINSTEIN AND KIMMELMANSTE 2410TWO GIRARD PLZPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004RUST-PENETRATING SPRAY LUBRICANTABANDONEDMay 25, 1976

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 1988EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 6, 1988ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 6, 1988EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Nov 25, 1987CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jun 24, 1987CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jun 17, 1987ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 21, 1987JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 10, 1987EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 28, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 25, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 23, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 9, 1985CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 18, 1985CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 21, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 27, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance