Drawing for PIPS BY ROOSTER

USPTO serial 73509818

PIPS BY ROOSTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIPS BY ROOSTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES K. SILBERMAN

JAMES K SILBERMAN BLUM KAPLAN FRIEDMAN SILBERMAN & BERAN1120 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025TIESABANDONEDNov 10, 1982

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 1987EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Oct 2, 1986ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 2, 1986EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Sep 8, 1986EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 4, 1986EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 10, 1985CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Oct 18, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 15, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 21, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 24, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance