Drawing for MAXIM'S

USPTO serial 73516311

MAXIM'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAXIM'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS N. YOUNG

THOMAS N YOUNG KRASS, YOUNG & SCHIVLEY2855 COOLIDGESTE 210TROY, MI 48084

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028CHRISTMAS TREE ORNAMENTS AND DECORATIONSABANDONEDDec 1, 1984
042MAIL ORDER SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF GIFT AND NOVELTY ITEMSABANDONEDDec 1, 1984

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 1987ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Feb 20, 1987OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jan 20, 1987OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Jun 12, 1986OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Feb 18, 1986PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 19, 1986NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 17, 1985CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 11, 1985CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Nov 12, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 29, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 8, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance