USPTO serial 73520819
PC DOCTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PC DOCTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SPRING LAKE, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOEL F. SPIVAK
JOEL F SPIVAKP O BOX 51738 YORKTOWN RDE BRUNSWICK, NJ 08816Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | MAINTENANCE, REPAIRS AND INSTALLATION OF COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS | ABANDONED | May 29, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 9, 1988 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 9, 1988 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 14, 1987 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 24, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 18, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |