USPTO serial 73522484
BARBICAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BARBICAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. JOHN CAMPAIGN
H JOHN CAMPAIGN GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN & MCCARTHY36 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | ARTICLES OF OUTERCLOTHING, NAMELY WRISTBANDS, HEADBANDS, JOGGING SUITS, SWEATSHIRTS, SKIRTS, SPORTS SHIRTS, SPORTS SHORTS; SWEATERS, WAISTCOATS, LEOTARDS, TIES, T-SHIRTS, AND BOOTS, SHOES AND SLIPPERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 1991 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |