Drawing for CERTIFIED ANGUS BEEF

USPTO serial 73527242

CERTIFIED ANGUS BEEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARSH, SHARON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CERTIFIED ANGUS BEEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RONALD L. PANITCH

RONALD L PANITCH FIVE PENN CTR PLZ36TH FL1601 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
ATHE CERTIFICATION MARK SHOWN IN THE ACCOMPANYING DRAWING FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BEEFABANDONEDJan 19, 1979

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 1991ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 28, 1990EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 17, 1990EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 24, 1990CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 18, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 1990EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 16, 1989CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 13, 1989JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 13, 1989EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 17, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 28, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance