CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SELENIA

USPTO serial 73527903

SELENIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1462537Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 27, 1987
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SELENIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH A. DEGRANDI

JOSEPH A DEGRANDI BEVERIDGE, DEGRANDI, WEILACHER & YOUNG1850 M ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR CIVIL AND MILITARY PURPOSES, NAMELY, SHORT, MEDIUM AND LONG RANGE PRIMARY RADARS; SECONDARY RADARS; COMPUTERS; RADAR DATA EXTRACTORS; [ SIMULATORS FOR AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL; RADIO COMMUNICATION APPARATUS FOR GROUND-AIR-GROUND RADIO COMMUNICATIONS; ] TRIDIMENSIONAL RADARS FOR AIR SURVEILLANCE; COAST AND LOW ALTITUDE SURVEILLANCE RADARS; RADARS FOR AUTOMATIC FIRE CONTROL; TERRESTRIAL SURFACE-AIR MISSILE RADAR APPARATUS FOR POINT DEFENSE AND FOR BATTLE POINT; AIR-AIR MISSILE RADAR APPARATUS AIR DEFENSE RADAR FOR INTERCEPTION, ANALYSIS AND JAMMING OF RADAR SIGNALS; LASER AND RADAR SIGHTING AND TRACKING APPARATUS; LASER APPARATUS; SEARCHING AND TRACKING NAVAL RADARS [ ; TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, NAMELY, TELEPHONE NETWORKS AND EXCHANGES; TRANSMISSION APPARATUS, NAMELY, LARGE TELEPHONIC MULTIPLEX STATIONS, AND MICROWAVE LINKS; SYSTEMS FOR RETAIL INFORMATION, NAMELY, GENERAL PURPOSE MINICOMPUTERS ]EXPIRED—
013ARMS, NAMELY, AIR TO GROUND, GROUND TO GROUND, AIR TO AIR AND SURFACE TO AIR BALLISTIC MISSILESSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2008CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Mar 13, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 28, 1995C15PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 26, 1994RRPRRESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION—
Mar 25, 1994PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Oct 27, 1993815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 27, 1987R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 4, 1987PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 1987NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 2, 1987CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 26, 1987CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 21, 1987JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 25, 1987EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 5, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 23, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 1986CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 9, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 1985CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 7, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance