Drawing for AN ALTERNATIVE TO TELEVISION

USPTO serial 73532168

AN ALTERNATIVE TO TELEVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AN ALTERNATIVE TO TELEVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARTIN J. O'DONNELL

MARTIN J O'DONNELL CESARI AND MCKENNAUNION WHARF EBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009EDUCATIONAL COMPUTER PROGRAMS PRE-RECORDED ON MAGNETIC DISKETTESABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 1987EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 1, 1987ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 1, 1987EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Apr 7, 1987EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 24, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 22, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 15, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 10, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance