USPTO serial 73535233
VALENTINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VALENTINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W. DUCKWORTH
ROBERT W DUCKWORTH DUCKWORTH, ALLEN, DYER & PETTIS400 W COLONIAL DRPOST OFFICE BOX 3791ORLANDO, FL 32802-3791Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY SHAMPOO, HAIR SPRAY AND CONDITIONERS | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 29, 1987 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 29, 1987 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 20, 1987 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 5, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 1986 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 17, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |