Drawing for DANAVOX

USPTO serial 73535441

DANAVOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1432732Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 17, 1987
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DANAVOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Diane M. Lambillotte

DIANE M LAMBILLOTTE BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLPTHREE EMBARCADERO CTRSNA FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009TELECOMMUNICATION HEADPHONES AND HEADSETS, AUDITORY TRAINING AND LISTENING HEADPHONES AND HEADSETS, DICTATION TRANSCRIBER HEADSETS, MINIATURE EARPHONES AND WIRING THEREFOR, ACOUSTICAL TRANSDUCERS, MINIATURE ELECTRICAL SWITCHES, CORDS AND PLUGS FOR AUDIO APPLICATIONSSECTION 8 - CANCELLED
010HEARING AIDS AND PARTS THEREFOREXPIRED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2007CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
Mar 9, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 25, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 24, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 18, 1994C15PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Mar 14, 1994PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED
Jan 18, 1994RRPRRESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION
Oct 25, 1993PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15
Mar 12, 1993815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
Mar 9, 1993815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
Mar 17, 1987R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 23, 1986PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 1986NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 27, 1986CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 1, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 21, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 28, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 27, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 24, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance