USPTO serial 73537191
SONOCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 2, 1990
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SONOCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CITY OF CONSHOHOCKEN, PA
NEW BRUNSWICK, NJ
CITY OF CONSHOHOCKEN, PA
CITY OF CONSHOHOCKEN, PA
WAUKESHA, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW L. NEY
ANDREW L NEYP O BOX 980VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | LOTION USED IN DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASOUND SCANNING PROCEDURES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 29, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERSPEC, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by JOHNSON & JOHNSON
- Other trademarks owned by INTERSPEC, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERSPEC, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named SONOCARE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2001 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 7, 1995 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 18, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 10, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 1986 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 1986 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |